Restricted vs Unrestricted Funding: Complete Comparison
The most valuable grants aren't always the largest—they're the most flexible. Understanding restricted versus unrestricted funding is key to financial sustainability.
Defining the Terms
Restricted Funding
Money that must be spent on specific activities, projects, or purposes designated by the funder.
Examples: "£50K for youth mentoring programme," "£20K for equipment purchase," "£100K for three-year mental health project"
Unrestricted Funding
Money you can spend however needed to advance your mission—no strings attached.
Also called: Core funding, general operating support, flexible funding, unrestricted grants
The Funding Flexibility Spectrum
| Type | Can Fund | Can't Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Highly Restricted | Only specific line items | Any variance requires approval |
| Project Restricted | Anything within project scope | Non-project costs |
| Designated | Broad theme/area (e.g., "youth work") | Work outside theme |
| Unrestricted | Anything advancing mission | Nothing (total flexibility) |
Why Unrestricted Funding Matters
What Unrestricted Funding Enables:
- ✓ Core staff salaries: CEO, finance, HR, operations—the backbone restricted grants won't fund
- ✓ Rapid response: Address urgent needs without waiting for project approval
- ✓ Strategic investment: Staff training, new technology, research and development
- ✓ Reserves: Financial cushion for difficult periods
- ✓ Risk-taking: Pilot innovative approaches before evidence exists
- ✓ Gap-filling: Cover costs that don't fit any funder's categories
The Hidden Cost of Over-Restriction
Organizations with 90%+ restricted funding face chronic challenges:
Cash Flow Crises
Restricted funds arrive for specific projects while overheads go unpaid. You're "grant-rich but cash-poor."
Mission Drift
Chasing restricted funding that doesn't fully align because you need the money, gradually moving away from core purpose.
Administrative Burden
Tracking multiple restricted pots, separate reporting, complex accounting—overhead that restricted funds won't cover.
Strategic Paralysis
Can't invest in new directions or respond to changing needs because all money is committed to existing projects.
Target Funding Mix
Healthy Funding Balance:
- • 30-40% Unrestricted: Core operations, reserves, strategic investment
- • 50-60% Project-Restricted: Specific programme delivery
- • 10% Designated: Flexible within theme areas
Organizations below 20% unrestricted face sustainability challenges
How to Secure Unrestricted Funding
1. Target Core-Funding Specialists
Some funders explicitly provide unrestricted support:
- Tudor Trust: Multi-year unrestricted grants for smaller charities
- Esmée Fairbairn: Core funding for organizations demonstrating impact
- Paul Hamlyn Foundation: Strategic core support
- Lloyds Bank Foundation: Invest programme (unrestricted capacity building)
2. Build the Case for Core Support
When applying for unrestricted funds, emphasize:
- Track record of delivering impact across multiple programmes
- Specific capacity gaps unrestricted funding would address
- How flexibility enables strategic responsiveness
- Organizational development plan and growth trajectory
3. Graduate from Project to Core
Many funders offer this pathway:
Year 1-2: Project-restricted grant proving you deliver
Year 3-5: Request shift to unrestricted support based on track record
Example: "Having successfully delivered X project with your support, we're seeking three-year core funding to strengthen capacity and scale impact."
Managing Both Types
Financial Management
- Separate accounting codes for restricted vs unrestricted
- Clear policies on overhead allocation
- Regular monitoring of restricted fund balances
- Never "borrow" from restricted pots for unrestricted needs
Strategic Allocation
- Use unrestricted funds for core infrastructure first
- Build 3-6 month operating reserve from unrestricted income
- Invest in development: fundraising capacity, systems, staff development
- Maintain flexibility for opportunistic initiatives
Conclusion
Unrestricted funding is organizational oxygen—you can't thrive without enough of it. Strategic fundraising pursues both types deliberately, building toward a healthy balance that enables sustainability and impact.
TL;DR: Restricted vs Unrestricted
- ✓ Restricted = specific project/purpose; Unrestricted = flexible core support
- ✓ Target 30-40% unrestricted for healthy organizational sustainability
- ✓ Unrestricted enables: core staff, reserves, innovation, strategic response
- ✓ Over-restriction creates cash flow crises and mission drift
- ✓ Some funders specialize in core funding—target them deliberately
- ✓ Build pathway from project funding to core support with existing funders