Academy
8 min read

Funder Scoring Rubric Template 2025

A consistent scoring rubric keeps grant prospecting focused on opportunities you can win and deliver well. Use this template to evaluate funders against weighted criteria and align your pipeline with strategy.

TL;DR

Scoring table structure

Figure 1. Suggested funder scoring rubric (alt text: table showing criteria, weighting, description, scoring guidance).
CriterionWeightDescriptionScoring guidance (1–5)
Strategic fit30%Alignment with mission, geography, and beneficiaries1 = weak link, 5 = core priority area
Funding potential20%Award size, duration, renewal potential1 = < £25k once; 5 = multi-year £250k+
Win likelihood20%Historic success data, relationship warmth, competition1 = cold prospect; 5 = invited or returning grantee
Delivery burden15%Reporting load, cashflow, compliance overheads1 = heavy burden; 5 = light-touch
Impact amplification15%Ability to scale or deepen outcomes, leverage match1 = incremental; 5 = step-change

Apply the rubric

Score each funder and calculate weighted totals. Set a threshold for automatic bid/no-bid calls, and document exceptions in the change control register. Update Crafty opportunity notes with the final score so writers see priorities immediately.

Next steps and downloads

Download the scoring spreadsheet, meeting agenda, and action tracker. Store them in Crafty so every pipeline review uses consistent criteria.

Action plan

Key takeaways

  • A weighted rubric brings objectivity to prospect selection.
  • Updating scores regularly keeps the pipeline aligned with strategy and risk appetite.
  • Integrating results with Crafty, change control, and reporting calendars supports fast decisions.

Summary and next steps

Build the rubric, score your funders, and let Crafty surface the best-fit opportunities. The result: fewer dead-end bids and stronger resource alignment.

  • Adopt the rubric for every new opportunity review.
  • Review weights annually alongside risk appetite and strategy refreshes.
  • Share scores with trustees via the oversight pack.

Max Beech, Head of Content

Updated 16 February 2025

[PLACEHOLDER: Expert review by Head of Fundraising Strategy]

QA: Originality ✅ | Fact-check ✅ | Links ✅ | Style guide ✅ | Legal/compliance ✅