← Back to Blog
Tips8 min read

7 Common Grant Writing Mistakes That Kill Applications

Avoid these critical errors that cause even strong projects to get rejected.

Published on January 15, 2024

Grant writing is both an art and a science, but even the most innovative projects can fail if the application contains critical mistakes. Here are seven common errors that consistently lead to rejections, and how to avoid them.


1. Failing to Follow Guidelines Exactly


The fastest way to get your application rejected is to ignore the funder's guidelines. This includes:

  • Exceeding page limits
  • Using the wrong font or formatting
  • Missing required sections
  • Submitting past the deadline

  • **Solution:** Create a checklist from the guidelines and review it multiple times before submission.


    2. Weak Problem Statement


    Many applications fail to clearly articulate the problem they're solving. Your problem statement should be:

  • Specific and measurable
  • Supported by credible data
  • Relevant to the funder's priorities
  • Compelling enough to demand action

  • **Solution:** Start with statistics, use local data when possible, and connect the problem to broader societal issues.


    3. Unrealistic Budget


    Budget errors fall into two categories: overestimating and underestimating costs. Both are problematic:

  • Overestimating makes you look wasteful
  • Underestimating suggests poor planning

  • **Solution:** Research actual costs thoroughly, get quotes for major items, and include a contingency of 5-10%.


    4. Vague Impact Measurement


    Funders want to know their investment will make a difference. Avoid vague statements like "help people" or "make a positive impact."


    **Solution:** Define specific, measurable outcomes with clear metrics and timelines.


    5. Poor Project Timeline


    Unrealistic timelines signal poor project management skills. Common mistakes include:

  • Not allowing enough time for key activities
  • Ignoring seasonal factors
  • Failing to account for procurement delays

  • **Solution:** Work backwards from your end date and add buffer time for critical path activities.


    6. Ignoring Organizational Capacity


    Don't assume funders will take your word that you can deliver. You need to demonstrate:

  • Relevant experience
  • Qualified staff
  • Appropriate infrastructure
  • Strong partnerships

  • **Solution:** Include brief bios of key staff and highlight relevant past successes.


    7. Generic, Template-Based Writing


    Form letters are obvious and ineffective. Each application should be tailored to:

  • The specific funder's priorities
  • Their preferred language and terminology
  • Their funding history and values

  • **Solution:** Research the funder thoroughly and customize your approach for each application.


    Conclusion


    Avoiding these common mistakes won't guarantee funding, but it will ensure your application gets serious consideration. Remember, grant reviewers are looking for reasons to fund projects, not reject them. Give them what they need to say yes.


    The key is preparation, attention to detail, and genuine alignment between your project and the funder's mission. Take the time to get these fundamentals right, and your success rate will improve dramatically.