Brexit Impact on EU Funding for UK Organizations 2025: Post-Brexit Funding Guide
Brexit fundamentally changed UK access to EU funding programs, creating both challenges and new opportunities. This comprehensive guide explains current EU funding access, alternative funding sources, and strategic approaches for UK organizations navigating the post-Brexit landscape.
Post-Brexit Funding Reality 2025
UK organizations have lost access to approximately €8 billion annually in EU funding but gained £2.6 billion in replacement UK government funding. While some EU programs remain accessible, success requires new strategies focusing on international partnerships and UK-based alternatives.
Current EU Funding Access Status
Following Brexit, UK access to EU funding varies significantly by program type, with some opportunities remaining available through third-country participation while others are completely closed to UK organizations.
Programs with Continued Access
Horizon Europe (Limited Access)
- • Third-country participant status only
- • No EU funding for UK organizations
- • Must be self-funded in consortiums
- • Cannot lead projects or host ERC grants
- • Access to specific pillars only
Creative Europe Programme
- • Third-country participation possible
- • Self-funding required
- • Limited to certain sub-programs
- • Focus on cultural collaboration
- • Competitive application process
Programs with No UK Access
| EU Programme | Previous UK Participation | Current Status | UK Alternative |
|---|---|---|---|
| European Social Fund Plus | >£1.2 billion (2014-2020) | No access | UK Shared Prosperity Fund |
| European Regional Development Fund | >£2.4 billion (2014-2020) | No access | Levelling Up Fund |
| LIFE Programme | €65 million (2014-2020) | No access | Green Recovery Challenge Fund |
| Erasmus+ (Most components) | €400 million annually | Limited access | Turing Scheme |
UK Government Replacement Funding
Major Replacement Programs
UK Shared Prosperity Fund
Scope and Scale:
- • £2.6 billion over 3 years (2022-2025)
- • Replaced EU structural funds
- • Focus on levelling up priorities
- • Local authority-led delivery
Priority Areas:
- • Skills and employment support
- • Business support and innovation
- • Community and place development
- • Infrastructure improvements
Access Route: Applications must be made through local authorities rather than directly to central government.
Turing Scheme
Program Structure:
- • £110 million annually
- • Replaced Erasmus+ for UK students
- • Global scope (not just Europe)
- • Widening participation focus
Key Differences from Erasmus+:
- • One-way mobility (UK students abroad)
- • No incoming student exchange
- • Wider global destination options
- • Enhanced support for disadvantaged students
Research and Innovation Replacement Funding
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Enhanced Funding
Additional Investment:
- • £1.6 billion additional research funding
- • Enhanced fellowship programs
- • International collaboration fund
- • Future Leaders Fellowships expansion
New Programs:
- • UKRI Global Challenges Research Fund
- • Innovation Accelerator program
- • Advanced Research and Invention Agency
- • UK-EU Partnership grants
Strategies for Accessing Remaining EU Funding
Third-Country Participation Models
Horizon Europe Participation Strategy
Partnership Approaches
- • Join EU-led consortiums as unfunded partner
- • Provide specialized expertise or facilities
- • Offer unique datasets or research capabilities
- • Contribute through industry or charity funding
Alternative Funding Sources
- • UKRI international collaboration funding
- • Charity and foundation grants for European partnerships
- • Industry sponsorship for collaborative research
- • University internal funding for EU partnerships
Value Proposition Development
- • Demonstrate unique UK capabilities or expertise
- • Offer access to UK markets or regulatory environment
- • Provide connections to global research networks
- • Contribute high-quality research outputs and impact
EU Partnership Through Associated Organizations
Research Institution Partnerships
Partner with EU research institutions that can lead projects and include UK organizations as subcontractors or collaborators.
- • Joint research agreements with EU universities
- • Secondment arrangements for UK researchers
- • Shared facilities and equipment access
- • Co-publication and intellectual property agreements
Commercial and NGO Partnerships
Work through EU-based commercial partners or NGOs that can access funding and subcontract work to UK organizations.
- • EU subsidiaries of multinational companies
- • European NGOs with UK partnership programs
- • Consultancy firms with EU and UK operations
- • Professional networks spanning EU and UK
Alternative International Funding Sources
Bilateral and Multilateral Programs
| Funding Source | Geographic Scope | Typical Awards | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newton Fund partnerships | 18 partner countries | >£50K-£2M | Development challenges, innovation |
| Commonwealth partnerships | 54 Commonwealth countries | >£25K-£500K | Education, health, governance |
| Indo-Pacific research programs | Asia-Pacific region | >£100K-£1M | Technology, climate, security |
| US-UK research collaborations | United States | >£200K-£5M | Science, technology, defense |
Private Foundation and Corporate Funding
US and Global Foundations
- • Gates Foundation: Global health and development
- • Ford Foundation: Social justice and equality
- • MacArthur Foundation: Climate and human rights
- • Open Society Foundations: Democracy and governance
Corporate Research Programs
- • Google.org: AI for social good initiatives
- • Microsoft Research: Computational social science
- • Amazon Science: Sustainability and technology
- • Meta Research: Privacy and digital wellbeing
Impact Assessment: Winners and Losers
Sectors Most Affected by Brexit
Higher Education and Research
Universities lost access to €1.5 billion annually in Horizon funding, affecting research capacity and international collaboration.
- • Loss of European Research Council grants
- • Reduced EU student mobility (Erasmus+ exit)
- • Decreased EU research collaboration
- • Brain drain to EU institutions offering better funding
Regional Development Organizations
Loss of EU structural funds significantly impacted regional development capacity, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas.
- • Reduced funding for community development projects
- • Changed application processes and requirements
- • Uncertainty during transition period
- • Need to develop new funder relationships
Innovation and Technology Sectors
Some technology sectors have benefited from increased UK government investment and new international partnership opportunities.
- • Enhanced UKRI funding for innovation
- • New global partnership programs
- • Increased industry-academia collaboration
- • Focus on UK innovation ecosystem development
Practical Application Strategies
Adapting Grant Applications for Post-Brexit Context
Application Positioning Strategies
Emphasize Global Britain Agenda
- • Align projects with UK's international priorities
- • Demonstrate contributions to global challenges
- • Show how projects enhance UK's international reputation
- • Include partnerships with non-EU countries
Leverage UK's Unique Position
- • Highlight UK's role as bridge between EU and global markets
- • Emphasize English language advantages
- • Showcase UK regulatory and innovation environment
- • Demonstrate connections to Commonwealth and anglophone countries
Build Alternative Partnerships
- • Develop relationships with non-EU funding bodies
- • Create partnerships with UK-based international organizations
- • Join global research networks and consortiums
- • Participate in bilateral funding programs
Building Resilient Funding Portfolios
Diversification Strategies
- • Mix of UK government, charity, and private funding
- • Multiple international funding relationships
- • Different project scales and timeframes
- • Various funding mechanisms (grants, contracts, partnerships)
International Strategy
- • Develop relationships across multiple continents
- • Join international professional networks
- • Participate in global conferences and events
- • Build reputation in international research communities
Future Prospects and Opportunities
While Brexit created immediate challenges, new opportunities are emerging as UK funding programs mature and international partnerships develop.
Emerging Opportunities
- • AUKUS technology partnership programs
- • Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership research
- • Enhanced Commonwealth research collaboration
- • New bilateral science and technology agreements
- • Increased focus on Indo-Pacific partnerships
UK Policy Developments
- • Science and Technology Framework implementation
- • Innovation Strategy funding increases
- • Levelling Up agenda regional focus
- • Net Zero innovation investments
- • International research collaboration fund
Conclusion: Navigating the New Funding Landscape
Brexit fundamentally reshaped the funding landscape for UK organizations, creating both significant challenges and new opportunities. While access to EU funding is severely limited, replacement UK programs and alternative international partnerships offer substantial potential for those who adapt strategically.
Success in the post-Brexit environment requires diversified funding strategies, strong international networks, and alignment with UK government priorities. Organizations that embrace global partnerships while leveraging UK's unique strengths will thrive in this new landscape.
Ready to Navigate Post-Brexit Funding?
Crafty understands the complexities of post-Brexit funding and can help you develop compelling applications for UK replacement programs and international alternatives.
Start Your Post-Brexit Application